Deadpool fans can all take a sigh of relief now. If you saw X-Men Origins: Wolverine, you were introduced to a character known as “Deadpool” but should really only be called “Weapon XI.” FOX bastardized a fan favorite character by adding powers that did not exist for the character, and sewing his trademark wise-cracking mouth shut. I was pissed. They attempted to make amends to fans of the character by filming a special ending for the character that implied that the “Deadpool” that we saw was not the real Deadpool. It was little solace to upset fans, but not long after that, the actor who played Wade Wilson in the film came out to announce that there were plans to move forward with a TRUE film interpretation of the character. Ryan Reynolds spoke openly and honestly about the character and his future, and has previously expressed his passion for the character. Basically, he said that “Deadpool” from the movie was not what he considered to be Deadpool. He was approached by superstar producer at FOX Lauren Shuler Donner about portraying the character again; this time in his own film. Reynolds response was, to his credit as a true fan of the character, “only if it remains true to who and what Deadpool is.” I guess that FOX is okay with Reynolds’ demands, because they are working on a script right now, and Reynolds is excited about finally getting to play the real Wade Wilson, the merc with the mouth, Deadpool!
“Look, I’m into any role in which I get to kick Captain America in the nuts…
Yeah, the script is in the works. That’s about all I can really say. They’re actively hashing it out… Well, I’m intimately involved with it. We’re just trying to break a story right now and figure out who the villain is going to be and all that stuff. But, it’s going to be just like the comic books. I’m gonna have a messed up face and you may see some flashbacks of Wade earlier in his life, but primarily what you see is what you get in the comics and that’s the goal. And there is no better place to draw material from than the comics which are incredible.”
Kick Captain America in the nuts. Classic Deadpool! I was excited by his responses, yet skeptical. He is saying all the right things, but this is FOX we are talking about, and they haven’t produced a quality hero film in years and still have not been able to stay true to any character’s origins and comic book roots. But this is different. Ryan Reynolds is the only man to play the merc with the mouth, and FOX knows it. He played Wade Wilson in the Wolverine film to perfection, and fans saw that and loved that. Reynolds has enough star power to draw audiences to a film about a character they may not necessarily know too much about. But most importantly, the comic book writers for a well respected Deadpool series have described Deadpool himself as “A mix between Ryan Reynolds and a shar pei.” There simply is no other to play the character at this time. So with the studio needing Reynolds involvement for the film to make any money, the savy Deadpool fan in Reynolds knows he has leverage. He has said that he will NOT play the character again on film unless it is a true interpretation. I believe him. He knows his Deadpool, and he seems to have a true affinity for the cult-hero/mercenary that has a deeper and darker story to tell than most realize. The origin story is full of great, made for movie characters, so who do you include? Reynolds has made no secret of the fact that he loves Cable as well, and wanted him in the Deadpool flick, but that seems unlikely now. Here is what Reynolds is thinking about Cable, and other potential characters for the film:
“We’ll see. That is all being discussed,” grinned Reynolds, “I’m hoping Cable will be in it. Look, I’ve made no secret that I love that character. I also love some of the more preliminary characters at the beginning of the series. I like Ajax — that’s an easier character to put in. And Black Tom,” he revealed. “I think there’s a lot of different villains [we’re considering]; you could do a whole bunch of villains in [the first film], or you could just have Deadpool going up against one guy. We’ll see.”
Recently, Reynolds has been doing press for his recent RomCom with Sandra Bullock, The Proposal. He sat down with MTV recently, and of course, he had to answer questions about Deadpool, and his responses will NOT disappoint you:
“I get to be the authentication police, in a weird way. To their credit — the studio’s credit — they want to make an authentic ‘Deadpool’ movie; they want to make it as close to the source material as possible.”
Reynolds also added that he and the studio have already agreed to some key terms. “He’s going to be the Merc with the Mouth, [we're going to give] all those answers that everyone wants. He’s going to have the scarred-up face, he’s going to be in the suit — and, it’s going to be incredible.”
Fans should be excited about this news. Yes, the realist in me realizes that we probably won’t get a perfect Deadpool film. The story, if done properly, would have to be R rated. Reynolds has said that himself, but that won’t happen. We know that no one wants to make an R rated hero film because it would seriously hurt revenue earned from marketing to children. But I do believe that Reynolds has enough pull to get us a Deadpool film that remains true to the intent of the character, and it will be as close as we will ever get. It is possible to do a Deadpool film with a PG-13 rating, and still have it be dark. Not dark enough, but it will be good. Look at The Dark Knight. They pushed the boundaries of what you could get away with in that rating group, and that will be a good thing for Deadpool fans. Studios will be willing to make another movie along those lines as far as tone because of the massive amounts of cash it made, and all the merchandising money made on top of that. Am I saying Deadpool could pull in TDK money? Let’s not get ahead of ourselves! But the film shouldn’t need to be a big budget extravaganza, so it shouldn’t be difficult to make enough money to warrant a sequel. And for all you skeptics out there who have never read a Deadpool comic, let me tell you that Deadpool is a fan fav for a reason – he is a character that the public will LOVE. He has wit and a surprising amount of charm for a hideously scarred guy, and he has the skills to amaze people on screen. Deadpool is a bad-ass. The film should be full of acrobatic sword and gun play, and with plenty of big explosions and big laughs. People will love it.
Right now, I’m cautiously optimistic about this film, only because of Ryan Reynolds involvement. He was great as Wade, and he will be great as Deadpool. I trust that he will get enough essential Deadpool facts into the film that fans can enjoy the film. It won’t be perfect, but I’d bet it will be entertaining. Can’t ask for more than that!
Join the forum discussion on this post




June 12, 2009
#1
If Ryan Reynolds ends up not being Deadpool for any other reason then conflicting schedules (which won’t happen), consdier The Deadpool solo to be among the long list of Comic Book Bastardizations (don’t know if thats a word, but sounds real cool) and count me out, I will pay money to watch Ryan Reynolds as Wade Wilson/Deadpool, but not for anyone else.
June 12, 2009
#2
He really is the only one for the part. That seems to be the general consensus among all Deadpool fans. Sure, there are a few who disagree, but the overwhelming number of fans I’ve seen on Deadpool fan sites and various other comic related sites really want Reynolds to do a proper Deadpool flick. I think he will. His quotes certainly are promising.
June 13, 2009
#3
This is good news but I have to admit that Deadpool, even the bastardized version, was one of the most exciting elements of the last third of Wolverine.
Does Reynolds look like Deadpool before his disease got the better of his face in the comic?
June 13, 2009
#4
You are right filmbook, the character itself was pretty cool. The problem lies in his name. That wasn’t Deadpool. Why couldn’t they just call him Weapon XI? They had to know fanboys would be pissed. Aside from the misrepresentation, the concept was cool and if he had another name I’d be singing a different tune, so to speak.
I honestly couldn’t answer your question with 100% confidence. I think he did, but there may be people who disagree with me. The writers of the comic had Ryan Reynolds in mind when in one issue they wrote in a description of Ryan Reynolds, essentially with his face f*cked up. But that could just be that Deadpool’s style is a little like Reynolds when he’s at the top of his game; a wise-cracking smart ass. Besides, Deadpool’s pre-scarred face isn’t shown often and comic fans know that appearances change from writer to writer. So it’s kind of hard to answer that. But as far as I know, none of the other Deadpool fanboys had issues with how Reynolds looked as Wade Wilson in the Wolvie flick, so I think people would tend to side on my side of the fence.
I’ll flip through my collection this weekend and see if I can find something that could properly adress your question Filmbook.
July 1, 2009
#5
I just read an article in Entertainment Weekly and it does seem that this is a Pet Project of Reynolds. He says that he has been trying to get something going with this character for a long time and he wants it to be about a guy in a red and black suit and it will be true to the comic unlike what Fox wouldn’t let him do.
The article is pretty good and you can’t help be get the feeling that he is actually just a pretty normal guy. More people should be like that in Hollywood…maybe we would have better films. After reading that I actually hope his career sky rockets. Good Luck Ryan and hope you get to make Deadpool the way it should be!
July 2, 2009
#6
I read that one too. That’s why I was so glad to see Reynolds cast as ‘Pool. He has always had an affinity for the character and truely seems like he wants to do a great job and create a movie for the fans like himself.
He’s been a favorite of mine for quite a while. I’ve always thought his comedies are hilarious, and I know I’ll take flak for this, but I really enjoyed him in Blade 3. After seeing that film, I no longer had any doubts that Reynolds could not only perfectly pull off Deadpool, but could also play the Flash if they chose to go with the slightly less serious take on the character. I can’t wait to see this!
July 5, 2009
#7
I so hope Fox doesn’t screw this one up! I wish it was another company handling the movie.
July 6, 2009
#8
Do you ever wonder if execs over at Fox read posts from the net? They have to know that even though they made a little money on (insert film here) that people think they make really poor decisions across the board. From X-men to Family Guy you would think that they would want to make a good solid movie.
I just read an article by David Mamet and posted it over at our site. It’s wordy but seems to touch on this a little…in my opinion at least.
July 6, 2009
#9
Fox doesn’t care about quality only money. That’s why they fast track everything.
What site is that article on?
July 6, 2009
#10
http://www.MoviesForNobodies.com
Be sure to check out our weekly podcast! A couple of the “Movie Guys” have graced us from time to time and hopefully will again soon…
July 6, 2009
#11
Are you a Deadpool fan Cat? Or just a comic fan in general? FOX has screwed many beloved comic characters, and have yet to make a movie even remotely resembling the comic character’s comic history. Look at Iron Man – It was handled incredibly well. IM was a “B level” Marvel property, and he was not nearly as well known as Spidey or Hulk. Yet the movie went on to gross a ton of cash, and most importantly it was close enough to the source material to not piss off the fanboys too much. I’ve read every issue of IM through Dark Reign, and while there were some liberties taken it managed to stay true to the feel of the comic. It was very impressive. Not a chance in Hell FOX’s Deadpool film is that good, but I have to have some blind faith that they won’t screw it up too bad.
Great find JD, thanks! Very interesting. I refuse to believe that studios don’t have at least one employee monitoring at least the bigger bloggers like /FILM and AICN. But Cat is 100% right – it’s all about the money. The bitter truth is that people will go to see these movies regardless of how true they are to the source. There just isn’t a large enough demo of people who care for a studio like FOX to make the movie the right way. I really hope MARVEL’s upcoming slate of Thor, Captain America: The First Avenger, Iron Man 2, and the Avengers will make major bank so they can afford to buy back the rights to some of their characters. Either that, or show studio’s like FOX that there is a way to make a profitable comic film that stays true to the source.
MoviesForNobodies comes with my highest recommendation to cat and everyone else for that matter! It’s a fun way to kill an hour and they know their stuff too. I had a lot of fun being on and would welcome the chance to come back!
July 7, 2009
#12
I’m a big fan of comics in general and Deadpool. I’ve always collected comics since I was a kid and it was a fun hobby and made me some money too.
Fox will continue to screw things up but at least they have Avatar coming out (I think it’s Fox). Cameron wouldn’t let them screw that one up because he’s the man but they have done nothing else right. They screw up all the movies and will continue to do so. Marvel is great and I love what they are doing with their franchises. IM was awesome and they have a couple more coming out in the near future that should be very cool too (Thor and Captain America). IM2 should be awesome with RDJ and Mickey Rourke. Hopefully they somehow come up with a good script and tie them all in with a Civil War Trilogy. I think that would be a tough but great idea!
And never have faith in Fox. I have learned my lesson. Go into Deadpool with the worst expectations and it might actually surprise you.
July 10, 2009
#13
Well it’s good to have another comic afficianato here from time to time. I have a pretty big collection that I’m in the process of going digital with so I can have a backup just in case. Are you Marvel, DC, both? Maybe Image or Dark Horse? Personally, I read them all. Love comics!
A civil war film trilogy would be freaking epic! I’d love to see that some day, even it was only a DVD animated release. It probably wouldn’t work as a live action film unless they decided to make it a stand-alone type film without the starpower of the individual films for each character. Still, that would be freaking sweet!!!
Go in with low expectations, and you may be surprised… I’ve thought that way for quite some time about a lot of film projects. I always WANT to think that way, but it’s a lot easier for me to do with characters that I don’t have strong feelings for. Like, I could never do that for Deadpool, and to a lesser extent I couldn’t do that for Iron Man or Green Lantern either. I have a soft spot for Spawn too, but after that first film I just don’t expect much, so anything new I go in thinking that it can’t possibly be any worse.
But I guess that when I really think about Deadpool, everything I’ve read in every comic he’s ever appeared in, and everything I’ve seen and heard about Ryan Reynolds and the film and what he wants to do with the character, and I don’t expect greatness or even have high hopes. It’s more that I want it to be good SOOO BADLY that I refuse to accept that FOX is doing the film or I try to tell myself that things will be different this time. The thing that I think that works in Deadpool’s favor is that he is not a typical superhero comic book star. They don’t have to stick to some specific formula with him. And his past is so vague. Throw in the fact that he is crazy and completely unpredictable… There are so many different things that they could do with the character and the story of the movie, and it would fit with the feel of the character. At the end of the day, as long as it FEELS like Deadpool, I’ll be happy. And get the costume close to one of the costumes he’s worn in his appearances. I’m a big fan of the Civil War and late Cable and Deadpool style dead-suit. That’s a wicked cool look.
The MoviesForNobodies crew have had a discussion similar to this before, and I bring it up because someone brought up a really great way to look at things that I hadn’t thought of before. Sorry guys, I can’t remember which one of you it was. Anyway, they said that some of the tweaks characters go through in the transition from comics to film can be similar to a new writer/artist team coming in to do a character. They all want to put their own little spin on the character and the story, make it theirs. I think that’s a really great idea, and it theoretically help comic fans deal with some of the “flaws” of the characters on film. Now, does it justify what Schumacher did to Batman? Hell no. You can’t just come in a make MAJOR changes to the character, enough to take away the feel of the character. But stylizing things a bit, some small costume changes, and maybe even a few little tweaks of the backstory – as long as it is only to help modernize or make the story a little more relatable to audiences.
Wow, kind of got away from Deadpool there. The thing is, the movie will probably do well enough to expose the character to enough people to get his comics some more sales, maybe get some merchandising, videogames, and definitely get enough people interested in the character to give Marvel ample motivation to get the rights back and make a REAL Deadpool film. At least we can take solace in that, right?