MovieGuys.orgWatchmen – Review

Dark Light
Watchmen – Review
Review Score:

I am a Watchmen fanatic.  I just decided that it would be better to come right out and say it, get it out in the open.  I first read the Graphic Novel (one of the most celebrated graphic novels of all time, by the way) when I was 14.  In the years since then, I’ve read it many, many times.  I find it to be one of the most creative, dark, intense, and beautiful works in the comic world.  For years, I dreamed about the possibilities of seeing my beloved Watchmen come to life on the big screen.  My heart nearly stopped with excitement upon hearing the news that Zack Snyder, the visionary director who brought to life 300.   All seemed to be going well.  Word was that there was a great script out there, and Snyder became such a big fan of the graphic novel that he was hell bent on staying true to the source material.  Great news.  Then, my heart nearly stopped again, during the whole “lawsuit fiasco,” which I will not get into here.  It had been called “the movie that will never get made” because of all the failed attempts to bring it to life over the last 15-20 years.    And with news of the lawsuit, I feared that the prophecy would hold true, that Watchmen would never come to be.  But, by the grace of God, the lawsuit was settled and the film completed.  

I bought tickets when they first became available.  I’ve seen it multiple times already.  I’m glad I did, because I’ll tell you that anyone who attempts to review this film after only one viewing cannot possibly give the reader an accurate depiction of the film.  This is the hardest review I’ve ever had to write, because I’m determined to keep this review relatively spoiler free.  I strive to review this from the mind of a man who knows nothing about the graphic novel.  I pride myself in being objective, just like this review will be.  Finally, before the review begins, I’d like to recommend to you all that if you see and enjoy the film, an amazing way to enhance the experience is through the releases of Tales of the Black Freighter and the motion comic.  Black Freighter is an animated adaptation of  a fictional comic within the comic.  It is great to see that director Zack Snyder decided to take on the Black Freighter story, despite the fact that it doesn’t exactly have a place in the main film.  Clack Freighter is an integral part of the Watchmen experience.  The motion comic is a semi-animated version of the Watchmen comic itself, taking panels and reading the dialogue out loud, and adding minor animations to make the comic come alive.  It is a great way to enhance your enjoyment of the film.  Plus, if you saw the movie and you’ve never read the graphic novel, go pick it up!

<The following review contains MILD SPOILERS>

This is the film I’ve waited my whole life  to see.  This is the review I’ve waited my whole life to write.  You see, Watchmen  is a hero story like you’ve never experienced before, not even in Nolan’s The Dark Knight.  For anyone to do an accurate, true to the source material type film, it would have to be, because Watchmen was a hero comic like we hadn’t experienced before it, and rarely have experienced since.  The story is centered in an alternate timeline, United States in 1985.  Richard Nixon is still the President, having been elected to a fifth term, and costumed heroes have been outlawed.  There was a time, not long before then, when they were a huge part of American lives.  Costumed avengers existed, stopping crime and keeping the streets clean.  But things went wrong.  Terribly wrong, eventually leading to the passage of the Keene Act, effectively putting an end to costumed super heroes that are not sanctioned by the government.  As the world became a turbulent place during the events of the Cold War (Or Watchmen’s version of it, still involving Russian Nuclear armament)  the people lashed out against the heroes, finding themselves wondering, who watches them?  Who governs the heroes who are supposed to dish justice?  Hence the by now well known term, “Who watches the Watchmen?”    When one of the aged heroes is apparently murdered, those who once protected the city set out to find out the truth, and uncover a secret that none of them expected, not even the all powerful Dr Manhattan.

The film follows a group of heroes, only one of which has actual powers (Dr Manhattan), as their origins are kind of revealed in the beginning of the film through a series of flashbacks.  Flashbacks are used frequently in this film, both as a means of establishing a back story, and to give the main characters a true look at their fallen “hero.”    Some may have problems with this system, and I can understand why.  It can be hard to follow at times, and it can be frustrating to see the film push forward through a series of glimpses backwards  in time.  Ironic.  The flashbacks are used to establish the back story of the characters, and it is also a means of showing the movie-goer just what some of the “heroes” are really like.  It is quite shocking to the un-initiated, and you will find yourself  rather confused when you see what these “heroes” are capable of.  The things they’ve seen (and done) are horrific.  These are the people we trust to enforce justice?  But it all works well.  Personally, I have no problems with the flashbacks, as they are a fine way of telling the story the way it was intended to be told.   This is, without a doubt, a comic based property that comes as close to the source material as we are ever going to get.  I believe that it will also help to prove to Hollywood that we can indeed make a comic property into a successful film while staying true to the source material.  This film could change the way Hollywood makes movies.

I mentioned irony a moment ago, and that was not the only ironic moment in the film.  I found that this film is riddled with irony, and this is part of it’s genius.  Sure, there are things that anybody can enjoy, but there are also things that only the wise movie-goer will understand, much like there are things in this film that only fans of the graphic novel will understand.  Does this impede the plot in any way?  No.  The film is accessible and enjoyable to ADULT AUDIENCES (Don’t bring your kids, parents, this is not Superman.  You’ll scar your kids for life if you let them see this.) that have read the novel, and to those that haven’t.  To those who have read and grown to love the graphic novel, you will find yourself pleased with Snyder’s interpretation.  He proved his love for the source material by staying true to it when it would be easier to have just changed it.  To those who know nothing about Watchmen, then you will find the movie to be powerful, stunning, breath-taking, awe inspiring, and beautiful.  It was simply stunning, and audiences everywhere will enjoy the drama found in a film about a subject that doesn’t typically lend itself to that type of thing.

I find the movie filled with symbolism.  You have to look to find it, but it is there.  Take this small bit from the very beginning of the film (Trust me, spoiler free!):  As the Night Owl 2 leaves his weekly visits with the original Night Owl, he walks through the gate in front of the place where Night Owl 1 calls his home (An auto repair shop),  you find a sign on the fence that is focused on for just a second, but it sends a message.  The sign reads “We fix ‘em.  Obsolete models a specialty.”  Think about it.  I trust you’ll get it.  Or how about the “crazy man” who seems to follow the heroes throughout the beginning of the film?  He carries a sign which reads “The end is nigh.”  The characters are a fascinating study of the world.  They worked together for so long, yet they are so very different.  They all had their problems, with varying degrees of severity.  These “problems” separate the “heroes” from what we would traditionally imagine them to be.  you think super hero, and you think “All American” and “Powerful” and “Just.”  But with the Watchmen, you could argue that ALL of them are true heroes in name only.  Each one has a dark side that they are hiding.  Let me explain by breaking down the characters (without spoiling them, of course):

Dr Manhattan is the all powerful one in the group.  He is, essentially, elemental energy in human form, a man who stands 100 ft tall and with the powers to see into time (forward and backward) and to transport matter, as well as destroy it instantly, with a mere thought.  His extreme powers have helped him grow into a man disconnected from this world, a man who no longer feels for the Earth or it’s peoples.  Ozymandias is a rich and powerful man, one who cashed in on his fame after he hung up his “hero shoes” with the passage of the Keene Act.  He is described as the most intelligent man in the world.  He too, seems disconnected through the world, and despite his very public life, he has secrets to hide from everyone.  Silk Spectre 2, the daughter of the original Silk Spectre, who operated as a crime fighter in the “golden age” of heroes, well before the Keene Act.  She is a reluctant hero, feeling forced into this life because of what her mother was.  Night Owl 2, the man to take up the mantle after the original owl retired and published a book about heroes after the Keene Act was passed.  Night Owl claims to be tired of fighting crime, and seems glad that he is no longer a protector of the city.  But strangely he finds it hard to say that…  The Comedian, the “hero” who was murdered at the beginning of the film, was an “All American Hero” in the mold of Captain America, if Captain America was a cold, heartless ass hole.  He was a savage, often claiming humanity will never stray away from it’s savage nature, no matter how hard we all try to hide it.    Finally, there is Rorschach,  the psychotic detective and conspiracy theorist.  He is a keen mind, with razor sharp wit.  He is also cold, blunt, calculating, and violent.   All together, they made up The Watchmen, and apart, they each played an integral part of the film.  But I promised no spoilers!

The film is full of questions.  If you pay close enough attention, you will discover them.  In these questions, you will find the themes that are intended to be explored, both in the graphic novel and the film.  What has the experience of being a super hero done to the retired heroes?  What has it done to the world?  What happened to the American Dream? I will not give you the answers to these questions.  But they expose some things to think about, which in turn leave you with more questions.  You will come out of the experience understanding more about our world because of all these things from the Watchmen’s world.  How should we respond to fear?  Would the world be any better off today if costumed heroes existed?  Watching Watchmen will give you the answers to these questions.  What if you feel like you have everything? Or if you feel that you know everything?  How do you connect to a world that you struggle to feel connected to?  You are also faced with stark contrasts.  Is humanity worth saving?  Is the world any better off with heroes, or are we all doomed despite the best intentions of our so called “protectors?”  ”What in life does not deserve celebrating?”   Yet the omniscient Dr Manhattan, as he so eloquently puts it, says “The Existence of life is a highly over rated phenomenon.”  How do you save the world?  A tough question, even for a man made god.  Killing millions to save billions.  The Ultimate “joke.”

Yes, this is a “hero film” unlike any other, because just like the graphic novel, it forces you to think; to challenge your perceptions.  By now, I’m sure many of you have heard of the infamous “rape scene.”  Yes, it is there.  Yes, it is a little longer than it was in the comic. But it was tastefully done and masterful.  It is, indeed, a scene that will be burned into your memory.  It was powerful and scary.  A classic example of how your perceptions of heroism will be changed.  The Night Owl (2) asked the Comedian in one scene, “Whatever happened to the American dream?”  To which the Comedian replied “It came true.  You’re looking at it.”  It is important to note that the landscape of the scene was that of despair and pain.  Innocents were hurt, as the city was crumbling.  Is this the American dream?  This seems to connect to our times so closely, which I find amazing.  The novel came out so long ago, yet it is still so culturally relevant.  The film based on 20 + year old source material, stays relevant to our times.  Even non-fans will be able to connect to the film in this way.    Why?  Why does this stay true to what we know of today?  More on that later.

The story is easy enough to follow, despite the flashbacks.  The music, while corny, is sufficient enough to set the mood and to convey the character’s emotions without a need for dialogue.  In Dr. Manhattan’s case specifically, that is good.  As his eyes are just white, it can be hard to tell how the character is feeling, and it is surely hard to humanize him.  But Billy Crudup, the actor who plays Manhattan, does this to perfection.  His subtle facial expressions and the cold, calculating tone he uses to speak, is amazing.  Crudup has done a fine job portraying a disconnect and near emotionless omniscient being.  And the film, on a whole, does an amazing job with the complex plot of the graphic novel, and translates the source material to film quite well.  You simply won’t find a better comic adaptation than this.  

While there are changes to the story, including the infamous giant killer squid (which would never have worked), the film was as close as any film will EVER get.  It is littered with classic scenes and lines, lifted straight from the panels of the comic itself.  This film could serve to change the way we all look at the “hero” genre.  It could also convince studios that making a comic film that adheres to the established facts from the comics, can also be a rousing success.  Honestly, without any knowledge of the source material beforehand, this film would’ve changed my life.  It DID change my life.  I know that sounds pretty dramatic, let me explain.  I will forever have high expectations for adaptations of my favorite comic book films.  The bar has been raised.  Now I know that a true comic adaptation can be done.  It was breath-taking.  It was purely amazing.  Who will watch the Watchmen?  I will.  Time and time again, until the day I tire of watching movies.  It was stunning, beautiful, powerful and awe-inspiring.  This film was a fantastic analysis of humanity, it really was.  The film may seem like a crazy, distopian future tale, but it really isn’t that far off from what humanity really is like.  Don’t watch the film thinking this couldn’t happen, because (aside from Dr Manhattan) it really could happen.   

I want to leave you with my final impressions.  This is what I left the theater thinking of.  I said the film is lined with questions, irony, and symbolism, right?  Well, there was a running theme throughout the plot line involving the Comedian’s death.  A mysterious “joke.”  It all boils down to humanity, like the Comedian said, we are all savages.  This is especially true for all of us in the real world.  Look around the world.  We ARE savages.  And humanity won’t change.  If anything, this film helped me realize this.  A sad revelation, but one I believe to be true.  Eventually, we will bring about humanities downfall.  Humans have always tried to kill each other.  To quote the movie:  ”Nothing ends.  Nothing ever ends.”  We will continue down our destructive path.  ”In your hearts, you know this to be true.”

23 Comments
  • Jon Stephens
    March 6, 2009
    Reply #1
    UA:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    I want to apologize to everyone for not getting the review up in the time frame I promised I would. Not only was this the hardest review I’ve ever had to write, but also I had car problems that prevented me from getting home quick enough to post. My apologies.

    This review was a labor of love for me, and I tried not to show my fanboy enthusiasm. All my opinions are genuine, even if I knew nothing about the comic I think I’d feel this way. I hope you all enjoy!

  • Bear
    March 7, 2009
    Reply #2
    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Outstanding post Jon. And I must say without reading the graphic novel and not knowing a whole lot about this movie, this is one of the best I’ve seen. I thoroughly enjoyed the story and amazing detail in the cinematography.

    I’m a pretty big fan of the comic book movies and wasn’t sure what to make of the trailers, so I entered this viewing a little skeptical about it since I heard a lot of people coming out saying that they really didn’t understand it and they thought the plot should have been better explained. Well, after watching it I really have no idea where these people got confused. I was entertained for the whole 163 minutes.

    Oh yeah, and my favorite line was when Rorschach said “I’m not stuck in here with you, you’re all stuck in here with me!”
    I’m not sure if that is an exact quote or not so please don’t criticize me too much for getting it wrong. :P

  • 790
    March 7, 2009
    Reply #3
    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    (;-)

    Very Impressive film! “Watchmen” is the Superhero “Mirror Universe” and it loves it! I’m glad I “DIDN’T” read the GN,,, as that would have taken away the tension and left me with only the visuals. I’m looking forward to the extended cut, and I’m going to pick up the full comic dvd that came out the other day.
    I picked up a ton of symbology Jon, the entire story is based on it. I also noticed Rorschach in the background as the guy with the sign, as I knew he was the actor before hand.

    Speaking of Rorschach he steals the film in the same way Ledger stole TDK. I remember (Jackie Earle Haley) as the bad seed in “The Bad News Bears” and now after all these years he comes out of leftfield and hits a grand slam performance! Wow, was I blown away with his scenes !!! He also had the best lines in the film, including one that literally blew the audience away. The entire crowd reacted to this one scene in a way that I haven’t seen in a long time. He was also the narrator of the film and his voice was perfect !!! (Take note Batman: )

    Also, I can now see why the first 20 minutes of the film was screened at Wondercon, etc. The opening was classic!! Not only the Comedian scene, the opening scenes exposing the alternate reality that the film took place in were amazing! I don’t want to give too much away but damn, both Kennedy scenes were mind blowing. The infamous rape scene was nothing compared to the base realistic violence of the film. It was nothing more than an essential plot point to the story. The critics blew that way out of proportion.

    Speaking of out of proportion, Dr Manhattan was great! He did have pupils but they were sparkling white. I guess it might have been hard to see them but they were there. His Dr M’ performance was spot on! (Billy Crudup) was great and really pulled off the personality of an omnipotent being. I think he could have saved the nuclear war problem if someone would have just asked him to consider a few different possibilities. Unfortunately all his friends were retired Superheros that were either told to fuck off by society, or ex girlfriends. However, he was central to the overall story as his apathetic irony was the focal point of all the events. It was ironic when the corrupt and clueless President Nixon would say, ” Well even Dr Manhattan can’t be everywhere at once” and the next scene you would see Dr M’ multiply himself in six different locations with ease. It was a reminder of how out of touch the President and the military had become after winning Vietnam in a few hours. Yes Jon the
    symbology was there in spades. The entire film was an acknowledgement on how the New World Order was orchestrated by means to a Superhero end,,, (by the smart guy) nice touch.
    The Owl is a sacred symbol of that order,,, I loved that ship btw! Speaking of Night Owl,,, the bulk of the story is carried by Night Owl and Silk Spectre II, I really dug the adult chemistry they had. The scenes where they took off in Archie were great. Night Owl really seemed to be the real version or alternate version of Batman. He had some of the coolest fight scenes in the film and his laser gun was cool even though that only lasted 5 seconds. Lol. Did I mention cool fight scenes, as all the fight scenes in the film were tight and Matrix like!!! Silk Spectre II was also a skilled fighter, and carried the (hot-babe) female emotional perspective in the story. She was damaged goods, but still a powerful and important character. The prison break scenes were awesome!

    The entire film had great editing, as it covered all of the character back stories. It was amazing they way the story was told in very well paced flashbacks. Jon, I know you said that the only character that has superpowers is Dr Manhattan, well I have to disagree. All the characters have there own special powers. That was very clear in the film…

    To follow up, ” Watchmen” must be digested after viewing it. Its so rich in story and symbolism that your left numb and dazed after watching it. The visual effects are flawless and the 80’s musical score was effectively executed, with the exception of the end credit song. (Absolutely horrid)

    Also one thing I noticed while watching the credits is that there are a few songs that were listed that are not in this cut. I’m assuming the credits cover the extended version as well,,,,

    Overall an amazing experience, and remarkable film! Great non spoiler review Jon!

  • Jon Stephens
    March 7, 2009
    Reply #4
    UA:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Thanks guys.

    I’m still in awe of the film, nearly 36 hours after first seeing it. This is one of those movies that you honestly can’t grasp after one viewing, even if you are a fan of the source material. 790, it may just be the fanboy in me talking, but I was captivated even though I am all too familiar with the source. I didn’t move one inch from seat the whole movie.

    From start to finish, this movie really was masterful. I loved the opening, and to all you people out there who have never read the GN but saw the movie, some of those quick shots from the film’s opening were not from the gn or were merely touched upon, so it was really great to see that. It set the pace for the film well, and they didn’t let up from there.

    I’m with you Bear, I have no idea why so many people were confused. It was easy to follow. My wife knows literally nothing about Watchmen and she got it first viewing (although I’m sure she didn’t catch everything, you simply can’t do that with a film like this, she definitely completely understood the plot). The fact that many people were confused by it leaves me thinking Watchmen won’t make major bank. But I really think that is a good thing. Make no mistake about it, this is the first comic adaptation that was made solely for the fans. There is so much that has been lifted straight from the panels themselves, and if you have read the gn even once, your Watchmen movie going experience will be enriched so much more. That’s the beauty of this film. And since it probably won’t make major bank, it’ll protect against greedy studios trying to make sequels based on a property that shouldn’t be sequelized. That would bastardize the property, and millions of fans would be pissed off big time. I’m telling everyone, if you went out and read the gn right now, and then went to see the movie immediately afterward, you would enjoy the film just as much as you did the first time, because you can see and appreciate the subtle details that people who have never read the gn would not understand.

    Rorschach was immensely well done. 790, I too knew that the “crazy guy” was Rorschach, but I know a lot of movie goers wouldn’t, and I wanted to point the guy out so when you do get to see Rorschach’s face, you’ll remember the guy and see that Rorschach was watching the Watchmen. I know a couple of people that didn’t really notice that guy’s face, so they didn’t understand the meaning of that. His tones, the way he narrated and delivered his lines, beautiful. Haley should teach Bale a thing or two about gruff voice work. I’ve always enjoyed Rorschach the most of all the characters. His back story was the most intense, and even though I knew essentially what he’d do in each scene he was in, I still could do nothing but stare in awe.

    Crudup was amazing. You are right about the pupils, but 95% of the movie goers wouldn’t notice that, and there had to be a way to humanize the character. Crudup did that almost entirely with subtle facial expressions/twitches. He was amazing.

    It’s funny you mention Batman, 790, because that is the basis of the character. I’ve read him described as a “middle aged, impotent” Batman. It was great. I thought he really kicked ass. That prison break scene was awesome!!!

    I get what you are saying, 790, about each one having a power, but I mean in the most literal sense possible. Manhattan is the only one with super human abilities. The rest of the team are just well trained or have keen intellects, something along those lines.

    To anyone who hasn’t seen it yet, keep an eye out for the rampant symbolism, and if you’ve seen it, go see it again. You’ll catch it, and it will give the film a whole new meaning for you. This movie really did affect me. Even though I knew every key plot point, Snyder did such a stunning job, I felt every emotion as if it were the first time around. It was such a powerful movie. I really, truly, honestly recommend this movie to everyone! kids excluded, of course.

  • the one and only momo
    March 7, 2009
    Reply #5
    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    i actually saw this last night. for someone who knew absolutely nothing about it beforehand i was actually able to pay attention throughout the entire movie. i have to say though, it was like hostel in the sense that there was a lot of gore and a lot of sex. I think I liked manhattan’s story the best out of all of them. although im pretty sure (as i heard in the theater last night) that they should’ve put him in a speedo the whole time. and dan’s character was lame. sorry, but i wasn’t interested in his story at all. jupiter’s was ok, the comedian was totally messed up and im glad that asian chick messed up his face cuz thats horrible.

    all in all, not knowing anything about it beforehand and not liking action movies too much, id give it a B-

    sorry if that disappoints everyone.

  • Metallicat79
    March 7, 2009
    Reply #6
    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    I will make an attempt to hopefully make my way to the theater and take a view. I wrote a little snippet that should be up shortly about an Outsiders take on the whole Watchmen sega over at GKS. Check it out.

  • Jon Stephens
    March 7, 2009
    Reply #7
    UA:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    This movie is almost entirely a direct adaptation of the comic. All those characters are the same as they were in the comic. There wasn’t a lot of gore though. There were a couple of gory parts, and a couple of sex parts, but the film was almost 3 hours long. The little sex and gore scenes they had didn’t even comprise 10% of the film. It was nothing like Hostel.

    But, the fact that a girl who doesn’t like action movies AT ALL gave it a B- really says alot about how good the film was. It’ll make good money this weekend.

    Please see it Metallicat. I know money is tight for everyone right now, but I really think this would be money damn well spent for you. Please trust me!

  • 790
    March 7, 2009
    Reply #8
    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    The film is doing really good at the Box Office.
    It set a record friday, and is on course to break past 60mil this weekend.

  • Boobies boobies buttsex
    March 7, 2009
    Reply #9
    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Never read the graphic novel. Personaly I have never seen a film adaptation of a book that even came close to doing the paper version justice. For that reason I decided not to go out and buy a copy of Watchmen. But now that I think about it, a book in picture form would be a little easier to put on screen, and I now regret not reading the book first. Even without reading it I felt the way the film was put together was perfect. I absolutely LOVE a movie that makes you think. Watchmen was indeed a deep movie. A lot deeper than what it lets on. It did a fabulous job of sprinkling tidbits of mind candy here and there. Dr. Manhattan, I did notice the pupils, but it seemed like they weren’t there in the begining and became more prevalent towards the end of the film as he regained some of his humanity. Correct me if I’m wrong but in the Chinese version of the film isn’t his name Wang Hung Long? I won’t put money on that, but I’m pretty sure it’s true. I will deffinately be seeing Watchmen a couple more times. And reading it. Soon.

  • Jon Stephens
    March 7, 2009
    Reply #10
    UA:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Great point BBB, Manhattan started to look more human as he began to regain his humanity. I think that was intentional. I’m sure now that the movie has come out, you’ll be able to find the graphic novel everywhere. You might also be interested in the motion comic. It is the actual panels from the gn that are slightly animated, south park style, with all the printed words read out loud. It was pretty good.

  • Bear
    March 8, 2009
    Reply #11
    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    It’s really doing that well at the Box Office? You wouldn’t know it from our theater. Stupid “Mall Cop” is still out-selling everything around here. It seems the comedies are the preference and comic book movies don’t get the time of day unless it has “Batman” stamped all over it. I’m sure its not like that everywhere though.

    Oh, by the way, ordered my copy of the GN yesterday. I’m really excited about reading it.

  • 790
    March 8, 2009
    Reply #12
    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Sales dropped a little, Saturday.
    There now projecting a 56mil weekend gross.

  • Stan-Lee
    March 8, 2009
    Reply #13
    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    So overall I did enjoy the Watchmen.

    But did anyone else feel like it was too drug out? I for one felt like there were times that they were just trying to make a scene stretch out as long as possible.

    I really need to watch the film a second time and take some notes on the scenes in particular. It really is a lot to take in with just one showing. There is som much to see, and so much to miss at the same time.

  • Bear
    March 8, 2009
    Reply #14
    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Hell yeah its a lot to take in. But I didn’t feel like it was drug out. I think there was just enough explained in each segment of the movie to leave me wanting to see more and by the build up to the end, I thought there would be more scenes to follow. I really enjoyed every aspect of it and am looking forward to reading the GN and then watching it again before it leaves theaters.

  • Jon Stephens
    March 8, 2009
    Reply #15
    UA:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    As the only guy here that has read the GN, let me tell you that it was not too drug out when comparing to the source material.

    But you definitely need to watch it again. I’ve seen it 4 times now, and I’m still not done. Now, part of that is fanboy, but obviously anyone will need to see it multiple times to completely get everything in the movie

  • Paul Green
    March 9, 2009
    Reply #16
    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    I have not yet read the actual graphic novel, so I am not able to compare this movie with the original. Just considering the movie story, I feel a bit unsatisfied. None of the characters play a strong role. I thought that the action scenes would be similar to movie 300, but it was not even 25% near to that! My $20 ticket was a total waste.

  • Jon Stephens
    March 9, 2009
    Reply #17
    UA:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Well I’m sorry you didn’t enjoy the film Paul. It most certainly was nothing like 300, and I thought they did a good job of conveying that in the marketing campaign. It never was about action, it’s a film about drama, emotion, human interaction and a symbolic look at life as we know it. But I can certainly see how someone would be disappointed if they went in expecting it to be like 300. Zack Snyder is capable of making films that are not about the action.

    You are not the only one disappointed in the story. This film was made mostly for the fans of the graphic novel.

  • Ergo Proxy
    March 9, 2009
    Reply #18
    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    I love your review!!!

    I love the WATCHMEN!!!

  • Jon Stephens
    March 10, 2009
    Reply #19
    UA:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Thanks Ergo! Can’t wait to read your review of the motion comic!

  • JD
    March 13, 2009
    Reply #20
    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    So I finally went to see it last night. Overall I thought it was done really well. I haven’t read the book, and I was able to follow along, though some of the “time jumps” were a little odd…(I’ve heard this about the book as well). But why people would have a hard time understanding that it’s an alternate reality is beyond me…You know what the first thing that gave it away for me was? Um…costumed super heroes and a giant naked blue guy. Just saying.

    I also thought the music was a little distracting at times. I understand what Snyder was going for, but I’m not sure if it totally worked. I liked the music, but it would just come out of nowhere from time to time.

    The fight/action sequences were amazing. I don’t know what it is, but I loved the whole speed up, slow down action…along with the “bone crunching” sound fx. Freakin’ sweet.

    I applaud Snyder for sticking to the story (as much of it as I know) though out of everything changed or left out, I figured the atomic-penis would have gone away. Even if he was a giant “Ken doll” he still would have looked cool and been close to his appearance in the book. Lets face it…it was totally for shock value when it was put in the book and when they put it on the screen. (Not that there is anything wrong with that).

    I plan to read the book. There are a couple things I would like to get a little more insight on, plus the ending “battle” was a little odd. Not real sure of the motivation behind not f’n killing OZ…just to prove a point if nothing else. And if he was “more of a hero” in the book…that did get lost in translation…he seemed like a pretty big prick and a “bad guy” all around.

  • Jon Stephens
    March 13, 2009
    Reply #21
    UA:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    So you’d say you liked it JD?

    The way they showed the fight sequences was awesome, and I hope to see more of that in the future. Just don’t let it get played out Hollywood!

    If you read the gn, I’m pretty sure most of your questions will be answered JD. Try to read it A.S.A.P so you remember as much as possible about the film, and then compare it to the gn. THEN you’ll see just how faithful it really was.

    Zack Snyder is my hero.

  • coffee
    March 14, 2009
    Reply #22
    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    I kept thinking that the guy who played the Comedian was Javier Bardem (I found out later that it’s actually Jeffrey Dean Morgan), but the two actors definitely look alike

  • Jon Stephens
    October 30, 2009
    Reply #23
    UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Thanks guys.

    I'm still in awe of the film, nearly 36 hours after first seeing it. This is one of those movies that you honestly can't grasp after one viewing, even if you are a fan of the source material. 790, it may just be the fanboy in me talking, but I was captivated even though I am all too familiar with the source. I didn't move one inch from seat the whole movie.

    From start to finish, this movie really was masterful. I loved the opening, and to all you people out there who have never read the GN but saw the movie, some of those quick shots from the film's opening were not from the gn or were merely touched upon, so it was really great to see that. It set the pace for the film well, and they didn't let up from there.

    I'm with you Bear, I have no idea why so many people were confused. It was easy to follow. My wife knows literally nothing about Watchmen and she got it first viewing (although I'm sure she didn't catch everything, you simply can't do that with a film like this, she definitely completely understood the plot). The fact that many people were confused by it leaves me thinking Watchmen won't make major bank. But I really think that is a good thing. Make no mistake about it, this is the first comic adaptation that was made solely for the fans. There is so much that has been lifted straight from the panels themselves, and if you have read the gn even once, your Watchmen movie going experience will be enriched so much more. That's the beauty of this film. And since it probably won't make major bank, it'll protect against greedy studios trying to make sequels based on a property that shouldn't be sequelized. That would bastardize the property, and millions of fans would be pissed off big time. I'm telling everyone, if you went out and read the gn right now, and then went to see the movie immediately afterward, you would enjoy the film just as much as you did the first time, because you can see and appreciate the subtle details that people who have never read the gn would not understand.

    Rorschach was immensely well done. 790, I too knew that the “crazy guy” was Rorschach, but I know a lot of movie goers wouldn't, and I wanted to point the guy out so when you do get to see Rorschach's face, you'll remember the guy and see that Rorschach was watching the Watchmen. I know a couple of people that didn't really notice that guy's face, so they didn't understand the meaning of that. His tones, the way he narrated and delivered his lines, beautiful. Haley should teach Bale a thing or two about gruff voice work. I've always enjoyed Rorschach the most of all the characters. His back story was the most intense, and even though I knew essentially what he'd do in each scene he was in, I still could do nothing but stare in awe.

    Crudup was amazing. You are right about the pupils, but 95% of the movie goers wouldn't notice that, and there had to be a way to humanize the character. Crudup did that almost entirely with subtle facial expressions/twitches. He was amazing.

    It's funny you mention Batman, 790, because that is the basis of the character. I've read him described as a “middle aged, impotent” Batman. It was great. I thought he really kicked ass. That prison break scene was awesome!!!

    I get what you are saying, 790, about each one having a power, but I mean in the most literal sense possible. Manhattan is the only one with super human abilities. The rest of the team are just well trained or have keen intellects, something along those lines.

    To anyone who hasn't seen it yet, keep an eye out for the rampant symbolism, and if you've seen it, go see it again. You'll catch it, and it will give the film a whole new meaning for you. This movie really did affect me. Even though I knew every key plot point, Snyder did such a stunning job, I felt every emotion as if it were the first time around. It was such a powerful movie. I really, truly, honestly recommend this movie to everyone! kids excluded, of course.

Leave a Reply:



Poll

Should they make a sequel to District 9?

Loading ... Loading ...
Latest Comments Movies for Nobodies!
Movies For Nobodies
From the people that brought you absolutely nothing comes an entertaining look at all the trailers, movie news, and opinions you could probably find by yourself on the net. Movies For Nobodies! The internet is listening... Hopefully.

Click here to listen.
Latest Reviews Recent Forum Posts