MovieGuys.orgMovieGuys.org

Dark Light
Taken – Review

Neeson - Taken

Liam Neeson - Taken

STARS: LIAM NEESON, MAGGIE GRACE, FAMKE JANSSEN, XANDER BERKELEY, HOLLY VALANCE, KATIE CASSIDY AND OLIVER RABOURDIN.

DIRECTED BY: PIERRE MOREL.

RELEASED: 2009

RUN TIME: 89 MIN

RATED: PG-13

<MILD SPOILERS>

Taken, actually premiered in France way back in February 2008 and has already made over 66mil worldwide. Not surprising as the film takes place mainly in France. I was pleasantly surprised by Neeson’s performance as he actually pulls off his biggest action role since Batman Begins.

Taken, takes off in Hollywood where over protective father Bryan Mill’s (Neeson) is planning to visit his daughter Kim (Grace) on her 17th birthday. Things are distant between his ex-wife Lenny (Janssen) and his daughter as a long career with the CIA has caused their marriage to fall apart. Bryan hopes to make her birthday special as he gets her a karaoke machine to help with her singing career. His plan gets upstaged as her new father Stuart (Berkeley), gets her a horse. Feeling more depressed then ever, Bryan’s old partners urge him to take on some part time work as pro-talent security. He agrees and in the process of protecting rising star Sheerah (Valance), he saves her life. His colleagues are happy to see him back in action, as Sheerah personally thanks him with an invitation for his daughter to meet her personal singing coach. He plans to surprise Kim with the news, however she shows up at a lunch date with Lenny in tow. He then finds out that Kim only wants to go to Paris with her friend Amanda (Cassidy), as mom’s there with the release forms for him to sign. Bryan’s not happy as he only agrees to let her go if she stays in contact with him via a international cell phone he gives her. During the trip to LAX he finds out that’s she’s really planning to cover all of U2′s concert dates. Reluctantly he let’s her go but he’s not happy about it, and more suspicious then ever.

Upon arriving in France, Kim and Amanda are so excited, they clearly stand out as tourists. They meet up with a handsome frenchmen who they decide to share a cab with. He later invites them to a party, and asks where their staying. High on excitement, Amanda informs him that their all alone up on the 5th floor. Kim starts to get a little apprehensive as Amanda’s cousins have left for Spain. Amanda it seems, was lying all along so that Kim’s parents would allow her to go. Amanda really just wants to party and loose her virginity in Paris…

Things get ugly real fast. During a phone call check in, Kim see’s Amanda being abducted. Bryan instructs her to go into the next room and hide under the bed. She’s ultimately found as he hears the whole thing on the still connected cell phone. As the kidnappers heavy breathing comes across the phone Bryan offers him one chance to release her. If not he promises to personally find and kill him. The last words he hears over the phone are “Good Luck”…

With the help of his CIA colleagues and Stuart’s private jet, Bryan flys to France to save his daughter. What happens next is non stop action, as he makes contact with an old French Police ally, Jean Claude (Rabourdin). During the search Bryan uncovers more than he bargained for, as it seems some of the French police are aware of the slave trade and are actually part of covering it up…

Liam’s virtually unstoppable in this role, at times he reminded me of Daniel Craig, in Quantum of Solace. The sex slave trade that’s exposed is pretty disturbing yet it seems to fade into the background as Bryan goes through one bad guy after another. The activities that the slave traders are involved with lead the viewer to have “zero” compassion as Byran systematically kills them all, in pursuit of his daughter. Towards the end of the film I actually cheered at a few scenes.

One thing that really upset me throughout the film is the very fact that the film is rated PG-13. This film should be rated R as the subject matter and violence is very heavy. It seems like you can kill or portray women as sex slaves as much as you like as long as the word “Fuck” isn’t in the script. The film is somewhat predictable, however Liams performance makes it all worthwhile. I hope we see him in more action roles or maybe even in the next Bond film…

14 Comments
  • Pattycakes myspace.com
    January 30, 2009
    Reply #1
    GD Star Rating
    loading...

    I didn’t read your whole article due to the mild spoilers(would like to go see tom), but I’m pretty stoked about this one. It seems that you know something that I don’t know about upcoming bond movies, and Neeson… hmmmmm Or just hopes and wishes

  • Atomic Popcorn atomicpopcorn.net
    January 31, 2009
    Reply #2
    GD Star Rating
    loading...

    This movie was a glorified Steven Seagal movie. Terrible all around if you ask me.

  • Film-Book dot Com film-book.com
    January 31, 2009
    Reply #3
    GD Star Rating
    loading...

    @Atomic Popcorn. This film was not a glorified Steven Seagal film. This film is better than ALL Seagal films except for Under Siege.

    @Pattycakes. Its a good film, very entertaining. If you liked Man on Fire, you’ll like this.

  • Jon Stephens myspace.com
    January 31, 2009
    Reply #4
    GD Star Rating
    loading...

    I just got home from this film, and I have to agree with Film-Book. It was very good, and definitely had that “Man on Fire” vibe to it. Definitely worth the money!

    But I can see how Atomic Popcorn would think that about the movie. I didn’t really think it was something everyone would enjoy. My wife said it was like a crappy JCVD film.

    To each his/her own…

  • Film-Book dot Com film-book.com
    January 31, 2009
    Reply #5
    GD Star Rating
    loading...

    Maybe not everyone, good action fans though. I’ll take this film twenty times over Transformers.

    By the way, JCVD, the actual film, is good.
    http://film-book.com/review-jcvd/

  • Bruce Simmons (BruSimm) cinemastatic.org
    January 31, 2009
    Reply #6
    GD Star Rating
    loading...

    Thanks for the outline 790. I can’t wait to check his latest project out.

    I work with scientists and engineers, and they live / work in a cave. When I said I can’t wait to see Neeson in his latest action flick, and they gave me this blank look and said “he doesn’t do action flicks”…. sigh.

    The cave I work in is dark, cold and lonely. It bites to work with people who don’t know they can watch TV when they go home!

    • Stan-Lee movieguys.org
      January 31, 2009
      Reply #7
      GD Star Rating
      loading...

      Not all engineers live in a cave Bruce, just most lol.

      And perhaps it was a glorified Seagal film, but it was pretty kick ass. Besides, the action wasn’t nearly as corny as Seagal’s films.

  • coffee coffeerama.com
    February 1, 2009
    Reply #8
    GD Star Rating
    loading...

    for some reason “Taken” made me want to go out and buy a handgun; maybe it was because everybody and their cousin had a gun in that movie

  • Atomic Popcorn atomicpopcorn.net
    February 2, 2009
    Reply #9
    GD Star Rating
    loading...

    My biggest complaint about the movie besides it being brutally unrealistic in many ways, was the lack of anyone stopping him. This is NOT a James Bond film so don’t sell this retired CIA Dad as Bond. He is an older guy who kicks way too much butt with nothing but a sling on his arm?

    COME ON. And JCVD rocks lol now that is corny action right there. AT least he knows its corny.!!

  • Jon Stephens myspace.com
    February 2, 2009
    Reply #10
    GD Star Rating
    loading...

    Oh hell yes! JCVD was very good. He actually regained a lot of respect in my eyes. I loved it.

    It was the first good Van Damme movie in about 15 years

  • PattyCakes
    February 2, 2009
    Reply #11
    GD Star Rating
    loading...

    still haven’t seen it, but I will and I won’t feel left out anymore ): lol

  • boobiesboobiesbuttsex
    February 23, 2009
    Reply #12
    GD Star Rating
    loading...

    I’ll tell you what i think. I think I’m going to watch it right now. I’ll give you more of my thoughts on the movie later.

  • Boobies boobies buttsex
    February 23, 2009
    Reply #13
    GD Star Rating
    loading...

    Ok, here it is. Mix one part retired James Bond with one part officer John McLane. Add a dash of Jason Bourne bouncy camera fight sequences and you’ve got the basic idea behind Taken. All around good action flick. Although I will say all the vehicles in the film were defective. Not one of ‘em blew up when they crashed. What’s up with that? Definately not a glorified Segal movie. Liam Neeson had to work a little harder to hotwire his car. Did anyone else notice in Under Seige (The one with the train. I don’t recall off the top of my head if it was 1or 2. It’s been a while since I’ve seen them. ) that Segal pops the hood on that old truck and there just happens to be two wires sticking up that, just by chance, when touched together, start the engine? Back to Taken. I would recomend this movie to anyone who enjoys a good action movie. And if for some odd reason you don’t like bloody gory action with an limited four letter word dialogue, Taken did a good job of keeping it PG-13 without taking away from the movie. You don’t really see that too much with movies anymore.

  • Boobies boobies buttsex
    February 23, 2009
    Reply #14
    GD Star Rating
    loading...

    One more thing. Coffee, you NEED a hand gun. Everyone and their cousin needs a hand gun these days. Lets say, I don’t know, some one kidnaps your daughter in Paris and no one had a hand gun? What are you gonna do karate chop all those guys to death? You’ve only got 98 hours! Your arms gonna get pretty tired. Hand guns dont get tired. Hand guns get even.

Leave a Reply: